Recent statements by former Afghan President Hamid Karzai regarding the need to preserve the Taliban regime and prevent its collapse have sparked significant controversy. Analysts argue that Karzai’s explicit support of Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada and his simplification of the Taliban crisis to the issue of girls’ education aim to bolster the political legitimacy of an ethnocentric and anti-democratic group, thereby maintaining a project of ethnic dominance in Afghanistan.
In a recent interview with Kyodo News, Hamid Karzai, the former president of Afghanistan, emphasized the necessity of maintaining the Taliban regime, once again revealing his role as a strategic supporter and behind-the-scenes lobbyist for this group. Not only has Karzai expressed concern about the potential for an international community-led collapse of the Taliban government, but he has also, in effect, given explicit loyalty to Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, attempting to reduce the administration’s fundamental issues solely to the closure of schools and universities for girls.
This approach is viewed as reinforcing the political and social legitimacy of the Taliban, aligning with Karzai’s longstanding positions; critics identify him as a leader marked by ethnocentrism, who consistently prioritizes the interests of his own ethnic group over national welfare, the country’s security, and the fundamental rights of its inhabitants.
Karzai’s record during his presidency reflects this same agenda. His stances effectively facilitated the Taliban’s resurgence following their fall in 2001, as he obstructed the military’s operations against them.
Even during the height of the Taliban’s violent campaigns and suicide attacks that claimed thousands of civilian lives, Karzai referred to the group as ‘brothers’ and described the presence of U.S. forces in Afghanistan as an occupation. Such positions clearly demonstrate his loyalty to the Taliban while ignoring the victims of the group’s crimes.
Over the past four years, Karzai has consistently engaged in lobbying for the Taliban during both domestic and international meetings. He has attempted to minimize the crisis facing the group to the issue of girls’ education, suggesting that if this problem could be resolved, the Taliban might govern as a national and popular administration.
This unrealistic analysis highlights Karzai’s role in legitimizing a terrorist, extremist, and anti-democratic group, indicating that his support is based solely on ethnic and personal considerations.
In recent days, amid increasing discussions about potential regime change and the downfall of the Taliban, ethnocentric figures and behind-the-scenes lobbyists for the group, including Karzai, Ashraf Ghani, and Zalmay Khalilzad, have expressed concern that their project of ethnic dominance, which the Taliban is executing, might fail. These individuals are striving to maintain the Taliban’s control and influence, a group that has transformed Afghanistan into a safe haven for regional and global terrorist activities.
Karzai has framed the reopening of girls’ schools as the only pathway to legitimize the Taliban, while proposing that a strong and effective government could emerge through intra-Afghan dialogues involving all ethnic groups. However, past experiences show that the Taliban do not fit into any governance structure that is accountable, transparent, and inclusive; they remain committed solely to perpetuating their dominance and executing their project of ethnic nationalism, considering elections and public participation as un-Islamic.