The recent attack by the Pakistani army on the border provinces of Afghanistan has faced a wave of internal and international condemnations. Hamid Karzai, Manzoor Pashteen, the European Union, and even Trump have reacted to the escalation of tensions; while analysts see Islamabad’s goal as pressuring Kabul’s foreign policy…
The recent airstrike by the Pakistani army on parts of Afghan territory has led to severe domestic reactions. Hamid Karzai, the former president of Afghanistan, condemned these attacks and stated: Pakistan must stop the invasion of the people and land of Afghanistan for its own good and reconsider its policies. He emphasized that the only way to stabilize the region is through mutual respect and adherence to civilizational relations.
Manzoor Pashteen, leader of the Pashtun Protection Movement, reacted to the attacks by saying: The Pakistani military regime, in the name of fighting terrorism, commits terrorist acts on both sides of the Durand Line. He emphasized that the attack on Paktika province, which resulted in the deaths of several local cricket players, is a clear example of state terrorism. Pashteen urged the people not to remain silent in the face of this blatant injustice.
Kaja Kallas, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, urged both sides to refrain from escalating tensions and to extend the ceasefire. On the other hand, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, claimed at a press conference: I know Pakistan has attacked Afghanistan. Solving this issue is the easiest thing for me, even though I currently hold the responsibility of leading the United States.
Asim Munir, the Chief of Army Staff of Pakistan, in his latest reaction accused India of politically exploiting the issue of terrorism. He also called on the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan to prevent groups that attack Pakistan from the territory of this country.
Tensions began after Pakistani forces violated Afghanistan’s airspace and bombarded Paktika province. Following this action, the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan conducted retaliatory attacks in border areas, which, according to local sources, targeted several Pakistani border bases.
Ethnic, religious, and political leaders in Afghanistan issued joint statements describing these attacks as violations of national sovereignty and blatant foreign interference. In the public space, slogans against foreign influence and surrender to the West have spread, and local television networks have also launched special programs to reflect the resistance of the Afghan people against foreign invasions.
In the official speeches of Afghan officials, the popular nature of the resistance is referred to as a sign of political independence. This discourse, emphasizing avoidance of dependency on Western powers, sends a message to the younger generation that Afghanistan’s foreign policy should be based on independence and the preservation of national dignity.
Analytical sources believe that Pakistan’s recent aggression is designed within the framework of pressure on the new Kabul government to change its foreign positions. They believe Islamabad seeks to prevent the expansion of Afghanistan’s relations with eastern powers by increasing tensions and to keep Kabul’s foreign policy aligned with its own interests.